EEB 5370 (2023): Restoration Biology
This year, we focused on reading papers about habitat restoration.
Week | Who | Topic | Reading | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
16 Jan | NO MEETING – HOLIDAY | |||
23 Jan | Chris E. | Introduction | 1. Cairns and Heckman. 1996. Restoration ecology: The state of an emerging field. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 21:167-89. | |
30 Jan | Katy | Restoration and theory | 1. Hobbs and Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93-110. 2. Palmer, Ambrose, and Poff. 1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 291-300. 3. Suding, Gross, and Houseman. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:46-53. |
|
6 Feb | N/A | NO MEETING | 1. Heger et al. 2022. Mapping and assessing the knowledge base of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology e13676. 2. Romanelli et al. 2021. Reliability of evidence-review methods in restoration ecology. Conservation Biology 35:142-154. 3. Society for Ecological Restoration’s database 4. Conservation Evidence database |
No class this week, but look over these papers and sources of information on restoration ecology. |
13 Feb | Laura | Theory in practice | 1. Young et al. 2005. The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters 8:662-673. 2. Hilderbrand, Watts, and Randle. 2005. The myths of restoration ecology. Ecology and Society 10. 3. Bernhardt et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636-637. |
|
20 Feb | Vikas | Implementation | 1. Suding. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 42:465–87. 2. Higgs et al. 2014. The changing role of history in restoration ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:499-506. |
|
27 Feb | Lindsey | Modern principles | 1. Gann et al. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology 27:S1-S46. 2. FAO, IUCN CEM & SER. 2021. Principles for Ecosystem Restoration to Guide the United Nations Decade 2021–2030. Rome, FAO. |
|
6 Mar | Hunter | Practical issues | 1. Pedrini et al. 2020. Seed enhancement: getting seeds restoration-ready. Restoration Ecology 28:S266-S275. 2. Weidlich et al. 2021. Priority effects and ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 29:e13317. 3. Breed et al. 2019. The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 20:615-628. |
|
13 Mar | SPRING BREAK | |||
20 Mar | NO MEETING | |||
27 Mar | Alyssa | Rewilding | 1. Lorimer et al. 2015. Rewilding: science, practice, and politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40:39-62. 2. Perino et al. 2019. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364: eaav5570. 3. Carroll and Noss. 2021. Rewilding in the face of climate change. Conservation Biology 35:155-167. |
|
3 Apr | Salt marsh case study: background | 1. Kirwan & Megonigal. 2013. Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504:53-60.
2.Liu et al. 2021. Success of coastal wetlands restoration is driven by sediment availability. Communications Earth & Environment 2:44. |
||
10 Apr | Salt marsh case study: Species-specific restoration | 1. Elphick et al. 2015. Tidal-flow restoration provides little nesting habitat for a globally vulnerable saltmarsh bird. Restoration Ecology 23:439–446.
2. Roman et al. 2002. Quantifying vegetation and nekton response to tidal restoration of a New England salt marsh. Restoration Ecology 10:450–460. 3. Bernhard et al. 2012. Increased variability of microbial communities in restored salt marshes nearly 30 years after tidal flow restoration. Estuaries and Coasts 35:1049-1059. |
||
17 Apr | Salt marsh case study: restoring services | 1. Needelman et al. 2018. The science and policy of the verified carbon standard methodology for tidal wetland and seagrass restoration. Estuaries and Coasts 41:2159-2171.
2. Cheng and White. 2022. Dredge-material created coastal marshes are more effective at improving water quality than natural marshes in early-stage development. Ecological Engineering 185:106814. |
||
24 Apr | Chris E | Future of restoration | 1. Perring et al. 2015. Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades. Ecosphere 6:131. 2. Strassburg et al. 2020. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586:724-729. 3. Fischer et al. 2021. Making the UN decade on ecosystem restoration a social-ecological endeavor. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 36:20-28. |